Legal Opinion

Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 26, 2019No. 114153PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Per curiam

*466Section 1 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights provides: "All men are possessed of equal and inalienable natural rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness." We are now asked: Is this declaration of rights more than an idealized aspiration? And, if so, do the substantive rights include a woman's right to make decisions about her body, including the decision whether to continue her pregnancy? We answer these questions, "Yes."

We conclude that, through the language in section 1, the state's founders acknowledged that the people had rights that preexisted the…

2Cases cited105 opinions

  1. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. EMW Women's Surgical Center v. Eric FriedlanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. In re Adoption of Baby Girl G.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  4. Wrigley v. RomanickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. State v. AlbanoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API