Legal Opinion

State v. Nece

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 26, 2016No. 111,401PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

Ultimately, this appeal raises the question of whether the State violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when it tested a driving under the influence (DUI) suspect s breath-alcohol content after the suspect consented to such a search. The suspect, Gregory Michael Nece, contends the evidence found through the breath-alcohol testing must be suppressed because his consent did not meet the Fourth Amendment standard of being freely and voluntarily given. More specifically, he argues the law enforcement officer coerced his…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. RyceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. State v. BoggessSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016
  5. State v. KraemerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2016

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API