Legal Opinion

Donaldson v. Mankato Policemen's Benefit Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1979No. 48775, 48927 and 48928PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES W. KENNEDY, Justice. 1

Appeal from a judgment determining that Muriel Donaldson, the widow of a Mankato policeman, is entitled to a pension. The Mankato Policemen’s Benefit Association had denied the pension, alleging that Mrs. Donaldson was ineligible because she had “commenced * * * an action for divorce” and “had been residing apart from” her husband at the time of his death. The trial court found that Mrs. Donaldson had abandoned any intent to obtain a divorce, and that her husband’s absence from the home was temporary, for reasons of health, and that she was eligible for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Mattson v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Bourdeaux v. Gilbert Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Larson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. Perine v. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Christensen v. Mpls. Mun. Emp. Retire. Bd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Dear v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Nordby v. Austin Policemen's Benefit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API