Donaldson v. Mankato Policemen's Benefit Ass'n
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES W. KENNEDY, Justice. 1
Appeal from a judgment determining that Muriel Donaldson, the widow of a Mankato policeman, is entitled to a pension. The Mankato Policemen’s Benefit Association had denied the pension, alleging that Mrs. Donaldson was ineligible because she had “commenced * * * an action for divorce” and “had been residing apart from” her husband at the time of his death. The trial court found that Mrs. Donaldson had abandoned any intent to obtain a divorce, and that her husband’s absence from the home was temporary, for reasons of health, and that she was eligible for the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Mattson v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Bourdeaux v. Gilbert Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Larson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Perine v. Grand Lodge of the Ancient Order United WorkmenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Christensen v. Minneapolis Municipal Employees Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Christensen v. Mpls. Mun. Emp. Retire. Bd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Dear v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Nordby v. Austin Policemen's Benefit Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984