Legal Opinion

Bourdeaux v. Gilbert Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 1945No. 33,994PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Youngdahl, Justice.

Under certiorari to the industrial commission, there is here presented for review the question whether relator is entitled to interest on an award of compensation. Only relator and his employer, New Brighton Ice Company, and the insurer, Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company, are involved.

On December 8, 1932, relator sustained an accidental injury to his back arising' out of and in the course of his employment with the New Brighton Ice Company. Employer conceded liability under the act and paid compensation to March 14, 1933, when it discontinued payments. On April…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Redfield v. Ystalyfera Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Redfield v. BartelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Henderson Cotton Manufacturing Co. v. Lowell Machine ShopsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  5. Brown v. City of PipestoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Doehler-Jarvis Division of National Lead Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Solakis v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Lappinen v. Union Ore Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Todeva v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Drake v. Norge Division, Borg-Warner Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API