Legal Opinion
United States v. Steven Richard Mottl
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1991No. 91-1436PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge.
Steven Richard Mottl entered a conditional plea of guilty to one count of embezzlement by a bank employee under 18 U.S.C. § 656 (1988). Pursuant to Rule 11(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, he reserved the right to appeal the denial of a motion in limine to suppress inculpato-ry statements given to FBI agents. On appeal from the judgment of conviction, Mottl contends that the district court 1 erred in denying his motion to suppress these inculpatory statements, which he made without the receipt of Miranda warnings during an interview at FBI…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Minnick v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Michael Edward LebrunCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Debra Sue Jenner v. James Smith, Superintendent, Springfield Correctional Facility Roger Tellinghuisen, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. W.J.B. Axsom, IICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Robert Kilroy GalceranCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Anthony LauritaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.