Legal Opinion
California v. Beheler
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided July 6, 1983No. 82-1666PublishedCited by 1,671 opinions
1Per curiam
The question presented in this petition for certiorari is whether Miranda warnings are required if the suspect is not placed under arrest, voluntarily comes to the police station, and is allowed to leave unhindered by police after a brief interview. Because this question has already been settled *1122clearly by past decisions of this Court, we reverse a decision of the California Court of Appeal holding that Miranda warnings are required in these circumstances.
H
The respondent, Jerry Beheler, and several acquaintances, attempted to steal a quantity of hashish from Peggy Dean, who was selling the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Beckwith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Standefer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- People v. HerdanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by1,671 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
1,666 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.