Minnick v. Mississippi
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kennedy
To protect the privilege against self-incrimination guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, we have held that the police must terminate interrogation of an accused in custody if the accused requests the assistance of counsel. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436, 474 (1966). We reinforced the protections of Miranda in Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U. S. 477, 484-485 (1981), which held that once the accused requests counsel, officials may not reinitiate questioning “until counsel has been made available” to him. The issue in the case before us is whether Edwards’ protection ceases once the suspect has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fare v. Michael C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by779 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995
- California v. AcevedoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
774 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.