Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert Kilroy Galceran
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 27, 2002No. 02-1480PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Per curiam
Robert Kilroy Galceran gave a statement to police implicating himself in a series of robberies. After his indictment, Galceran moved to suppress the statement, asserting he had been the subject of a custodial interrogation and had not been given the warning required by Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) (when person is taken into custody for questioning, person must be advised of right against self-incrimination and right to attorney). The district court * concluded Galceran was not in custody when he gave the statement, and thus no Miranda warning was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Michael Edward LebrunCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Edward E. Bordeaux, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. Randall Dewey Brave Heart, Jr., Also Known as Dewey Randall Brave HeartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. PerrinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.