Legal Opinion
United States v. Anthony Laurita
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided May 4, 2016No. 15-1137PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
Following the execution of a search warrant at a home in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) investigators questioned Anthony Laurita at a telemarketing firm where he worked. Laurita successfully moved to suppress his statements from that interview. The United States appeals. Having jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3731, we reverse the district court’s suppression order.
I. BACKGROUND
On April 9, 2013, acting -on lead from the Omaha, Nebraska, division of the FBI, federal agents executed a search warrant at a home in Uniontown, Pennsylvania, searching…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Terrance C. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Craig GiboneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Roland HoeffenerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Mark SandellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
- State v. Jeremy LambertSupreme Court of Vermont · 2021
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.