Legal Opinion
Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Winters
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 31, 1991No. 9632PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff, Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. (PaineWebber), appeals following the trial court’s denial of its motion for setoff pursuant to General Statutes § 52-141 (b) (4). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This motion for setoff arose out of an action by the plaintiff against the defendant, Geoffrey Winters, for sums due on a promissory note. The defendant filed a counterclaim for tortious misconduct. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff on its complaint for $440,000 and for the defendant on his counterclaim for $440,000.18. *324On May 15,1989, separate judgments were…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Capalbo v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. WintersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Saunders v. SaundersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Preisner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bower v. D'OnfroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WintersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. WintersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.