Legal Opinion

Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. Winters

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 5, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 26 Conn. App. 322, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the ‘only issue’ in the appeal below was to determine when a judgment is ‘final’ for purposes of General Stat*913utes § 52-141 (b) (4), not ruling upon Paine Webber’s argument concerning entitlement to an equitable setoff of opposing judgments?

Decided February 5, 1992 Jan A. Marcus, in support of the petition. John Haven Chapman, in opposition.

“2. Did the Appellate Court improperly fail to reverse the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WintersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. WintersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API