Legal Opinion
Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Winters
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 31, 1991No. 9800PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The defendant PaineWebber, Inc. (PaineWebber), appeals challenging the trial court’s decision denying a stay of proceedings and ordering the distribution of proceeds from a foreclosure sale. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The plaintiff, Connecticut Bank and Trust Company (CBT), instituted a foreclosure action against the named defendant, Geoffrey J. Winters. A foreclosure sale was ordered. After satisfying the plaintiff’s debt, $506,565.85 remained for PaineWebber, Weatherly Securities and Union Trust Co., each a subsequent encumbrancer. PaineWebber’s claim had priority over those…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Griffin Hospital v. Commission on Hospitals & Health CareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. WintersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Assn. v. LenczykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Solomon v. Hall-Brooke Foundation, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Paine Webber Jackson & Curtis, Inc. v. WintersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Centerbank v. ConnellConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. UptonConnecticut Superior Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.