Legal Opinion
Roberts v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided August 27, 1985No. 18093-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
Donald R. Roberts and his wife Elsie (hereinafter Roberts) brought an action against their insurer, State Farm Fire and Casualty (hereinafter State Farm), for damages to their home allegedly covered by their insurance policy. The trial court found that Roberts’ policy did not cover the type of damage complained of and granted State Farm’s motion for summary judgment. The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision, Roberts v. State Farm, 146 Ariz. 301, 705 P.2d 1352 (1985), and Roberts petitioned this court for review. We have jurisdiction. Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Brenner v. Aetna Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PaynterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. RossiniArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Crook v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Whiting v. AARP & Unitedhealthcare InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. AndersenArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Whiting v. AARPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Cooper v. American Family Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2002
- Planet Insurance Company v. Mead Reinsurance Corporation, Integrity Insurance Company and Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.