Legal Opinion

Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. Andersen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1988No. CV-86-0616-PRPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Chief Justice.

Security Insurance of Hartford (Security) sought review in this court of a court of appeals’ opinion that held, inter alia, that in order for an insurance company to deny coverage pursuant to a policy exclusion based on an aviation regulation, there must be a causal connection between the violation of the regulation and the actual loss incurred. Security Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Andersen, 158 Ariz. 431, 439-441, 763 P.2d 251, 259-261 (App.1986). We granted review on this issue. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 23 17A…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kepner v. Western Fire Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lindus v. Northern Insurance Company of New YorkArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Zuckerman v. Transamerica InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Mary G. Bruce, Administratrix of the Estate of Walter B. Bruce, Deceased v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WilsonArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Millar v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Economic Aero Club, Inc. v. Avemco Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Strojnik v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Thomas v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API