Legal Opinion
Cooper v. American Family Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided January 25, 2002No. 00-1097-PHX-JATPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TEILBORG, District Judge.
Pending before this Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. #28), Plaintiffs Cross Motion for Summary Judgment Re: Coverage (Doc. # 43), Defendant’s Motion to Strike Hearsay Report and Lay Opinions (Doc. # 50) and Defendant’s Motion to Strike Inter-vener[’]s Citations to the FC & S Bulletins (Doc. # 82). Plaintiff in Majdanski, et al. v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, et al., Case No. CIV 00-420 PHX-JAT filed a motion to intervene for the limited purpose of filing a response and sur-reply to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- McDonald v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fiess v. State Farm LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Boazova v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Erie Insurance Property and Casualty v. Dimitri and Mary ChaberWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
- Burgess v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
- Kelly v. Farmers Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.