Melendez v. Johns
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
This proceeding is one under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Rev. Code 1928, sec. 1391 et seq., as amended. The Industrial Commission denied Melendez compensation and dismissed his application therefor on the ground that the work he was doing when injured was not covered by the Compensation Law. The employers were Garwood Johns and Wayne Brand, according to the commission’s findings. The commission is made a party as the representative of the State Compensation Fund.
On or about May 1, 1936, and after the spring lettuce season in the Salt River Valley was practically over, the employers, Johns…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cook v. MasseyIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
- Peterson v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- State Tax Commission v. United Verde Extension Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Sullivan v. CashionArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- Shafer v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Madrigal v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Hubble v. PerraultIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
- Marshall v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Zeigler v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.