Legal Opinion
Miller & Lux Inc. v. Industrial Acc. Com.
California Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1919No. S. F. No. 8853PublishedCited by 33 opinions
PROCEEDING in Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. Award annulled. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission in favor of W. V. Fish and against petitioner Miller & Lux Incorporated.
The findings of the Industrial Accident Commission upon which the attack of petitioner’s counsel is directed are as follows:
“1. That W. V. Fish, hereinafter called the employee, the applicant herein, was injured on the 15th day of December, 1917, at Buttonwillow, Kern County, California, while in the employment of defendant Miller & Lux Incorporated, hereinafter called the employer, as a wagonmaker in a shop operated by the employer for the sole purpose…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Shafer v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- In re BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Oliphant v. HawkinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Koger v. A. T. Woods, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Lowman v. StaffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Irvine Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.