Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Farmers State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 28, 1930No. 27,853PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an award of compensation to an injured employe of Farmers State Bank of Eyota.
Julius Peterson, the employe, is by trade a carpenter. As such he was employed by the bank to repair the buildings on a farm owned by it and while so engaged sustained the accidental injury for which compensation is sought. It is not seriously disputed that the employment was properly considered “in the usual course of the trade, business, profession or occupation” of the employer within the workmen’s compensation act. G-. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 4268. The bank had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shafer v. Parke, Davis & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- State ex rel. Lennon v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Austin v. Leonard, Crossett & Riley, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Klein v. McClearySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Greischar v. St. Mary's CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State v. ChristensenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Koger v. A. T. Woods, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
- Mundell v. SwedlundIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Blew v. ConnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- Locke v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.