Legal Opinion
Andrus v. Estrada
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 25, 1995No. A064827PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J.
This appeal involves a dispute between lawyers for the litigants below. Plaintiffs’ counsel appeal, on their own behalf, from the court’s imposition of sanctions for the filing of a frivolous lawsuit. They allege the court’s order was unconstitutional, exceeded its jurisdiction, was defective in form, and was inconsistent with the court’s denial of sanctions to another defendant. We reject all four allegations and affirm the court’s imposition of sanctions.
Statement of Facts
On April 1, 1992, Lynn Andrus and Bret Bevilacqua (plaintiffs) entered into a written agreement with…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Yakov v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Sickle v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- BAHARIAN-MEHR v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Reedy v. BussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.