Legal Opinion

In Re Geoffrey Margolis, Alain Mercier, and Klaus Schlecht

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 7, 1986No. Appeal 85-2616PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

Patent applicants Geoffrey Margolis, Alain Mercier, and Klaus Schlecht (hereinafter Margolis), assignors to Nestec, S.A., appeal the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (the Board), that affirmed the rejection of claims 1 through 8 of patent application Serial No. 297,324 on the ground that the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We vacate the decision and remand to the PTO.

Opinion

The claimed invention relates to the manufacture of soluble coffee, and is described as providing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Howard SernakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. In Re Godfrey Newbold HounsfieldCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. In Re Charles v. Hedges and Victor MarkCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Lavaughn F. Watts, JrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  2. In Re Pravin L. Soni, Ceinwen Rowlands, Larry Edwards and Mark WartenbergCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  3. In Re ComiskeyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. In Re Morris EpsteinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. In re ZurkoCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API