Legal Opinion
In re Zurko
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 2, 2001No. Nos. 96-1258, 07/479,666PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge.
This case is before us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. Dickinson v. Zurko, 527 U.S. 150, 119 S.Ct. 1816, 144 L.Ed.2d 143, 50 USPQ2d 1930 (1999) (“Zurko III”). In Zurko III, the Court reversed our judgment and remanded the case because we had reviewed the factual findings of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) for clear error, an incorrect standard of review.
The Board decision at issue, Ex parte Zurko, No. 94-3967 (Bd. Pat. Apps. & Int. Aug. 4, 1995), sustained the rejection of U.S. Patent Application No. 07/479,666 (“the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Sang-Su LeeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Iron Grip Barbell Company, Inc., and York Barbell Company, Inc. v. USA Sports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Dystar Textilfarben Gmbh & Co Deutschland Kg v. C.H. Patrick, Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In Re Lavaughn F. Watts, JrCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.