Legal Opinion
Coester v. H.H.B. Co.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided March 20, 1978No. CIV. 74-1014PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
NICHOL, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss. That motion is predicated on two grounds. First, defendant contends that plaintiff executed a full and final release of all claims or demands or causes of actions against the defendant on June 28, 1971, which fully bars this pending antitrust action. Second, defendant argues that this matter should be deemed abandoned by the plaintiff’s failure to faithfully and reasonably prosecute.
Because defendant’s motion to dismiss and plaintiff’s response to that motion were accompanied with…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Virginia Impression Products Co., Inc. v. Scm Corporation, Virginia Impression Products Co., Inc. v. Scm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schmitt-Norton Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1981
- Grand Motors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982
- Ingram Corp. v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1980
- Runyan v. NCR Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.