Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided September 26, 1980No. Civ. A. No. C75-560PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KRUPANSKY, District Judge.

Presently before the Court in this antitrust proceeding is what has been styled “Defendant’s Memorandum On Its Release From Liability For Acts Allegedly Taken Jointly by CAPCO [Central Area Power Coordinating Group] Members, And The Inadmissibility of Evidence Thereof”. This submission, which is accompanied by copies of certain previously executed settlement instruments which assertedly evidence an intent to release defendant The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company (“CEI”), is in effect a motion for summary judgment and is accordingly governed…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. William Butler Smith v. Leman HudsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Runyan v. NCR Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
  2. Glenda Carole Desenne v. Jamestown Boat Yard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  3. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
  5. Romska v. OpperMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API