Legal Opinion

Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 1, 1975No. 74-1710PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FORMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an interlocutory appeal 1 from the refusal of the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania to apply a general release to bar a pending antitrust action by Three Rivers Motors Company (Three Rivers) against Ford Motor Company (Ford). The release, executed in favor of Ford by Three Rivers upon termination of its Ford franchise, was raised by Ford in the context of a Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R. Civ.P., motion to dismiss the antitrust claim. 2 For the reasons set forth herein, it is held that the release bars Three Rivers’…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  2. Erie Telecommunications, Inc. v. City of Erie, PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Gamewell Manufacturing, Inc., a Corporation v. Hvac Supply, Inc., and Aeronca, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API