Schmitt-Norton Ford, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on cross motions by the parties. The defendant has moved to dismiss all claims or, alternatively, for summary judgment. The plaintiffs have moved for an order striking certain defenses or, alternatively, for summary judgment. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment will be granted.
FACTS
In determining whether to grant a summary judgment motion, a court must give the nonmoving party the benefit of all reasonable inferences and view the facts in the light most favorable to the opposing party. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Three Rivers Motors Company v. The Ford Motor Company and Auto Lite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- George Arnott v. The American Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Thomas A. Vincel v. White Motor Corporation and Glenn F. KommerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Couillard v. Charles T. Miller Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- DeValk Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Rochester Ford Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Carlock v. Pillsbury Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
- Al Vaughn, Marjorie Vaughn, Algon Corporation and Springfield Drive-Ins, Inc. v. General Foods Corporation and Burger Chef Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Sorensen v. Coast-To-Coast Stores (Central Organization), Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.