Legal Opinion
Schwarze v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 19, 1929No. 18923PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEEHEE, C.
Plaintiff in error, H. T. Schwarze, plaintiff below, on March 20, 1925, brought suit against defendants in error, A. C. Baxter, a real estate broker, and his surety, New Amsterdam Casualty Company, defendants below, to recover the sum of $1,000, which, it was alleged, defendant Baxter had wrongfully received as his commission in a sale by him made of certain property owned by plaintiff.
Plaintiff’s allegations of fact, in substance, were that defendant Baxter was a real estate broker operating in Oklahoma City. Pursuant to the then existing law, chapter 205, S. Jj. 1923, he gave bond…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
- Norman v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Bartlett v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Home Indemnity Co. v. MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- American Surety Co. of New York v. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Dixon v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Anthony v. ColvinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Turk Bros. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.