Legal Opinion

Bartlett v. Wheeler

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1902PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Livingston county; the Hon. G. W. Patton, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Magruder

Appellee, Eleanor Wheeler, was surety upon the bond, upon which this suit is brought. The condition of the bond was that, if T. H. Wheeler should perform his agreements and covenants as set forth “in the within contract,” and in every respect comply therewith, and, on the termination thereof by limitation or otherwise, should fully pay Bartlett, Frazier & Co. the money, which might be due them, their executors, etc., then the obligation was to be void. In order to determine what the agreements and covenants were, which T. H. Wheeler was to do and perform, it is necessary to refer to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Farrar and Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  3. County of Mahaska v. IngallsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  4. Roper v. Trustees of Sangamon Lodge No. 6Illinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1843

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Janowiak v. TiesiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FultzSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  3. Merchants' National Bank v. CresseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  4. Mapes v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Home Indemnity Co. v. MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API