Legal Opinion
Home Indemnity Co. v. Missouri
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 1, 1935No. 10211PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
This is an action by the state of Missouri upon a surety bond given by the Southern Surety Company, a New York corporation, as principal, and the appel*392lant, Home Indemnity Company, as surety, to qualify the principal to continue to carry on its compensation insurance business in Missouri. The action is for the use and benefit of any and all persons, firms, and corporations entitled to compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law of the state of Missouri (Mo. St. Ann. § 3299 et seq., p. 8229 et seq.) on policies issued by the Southern Surety Company. The case was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. HethSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- United States v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Neild v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Highway Truck Drivers and Helpers Local 107 v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Ginsberg v. LindelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Dennis Dillon Oldsmobile, GMC, Inc. v. ZdunichUtah Supreme Court · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.