State v. Huyck
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, J. PRO TEMPORE
Defendant entered a plea of guilty to a charge of theft in the first degree. She was sentenced to pay restitution in the amount of $2,975 and costs in the amount of $150. She claims the trial court erroneously ordered her to pay these amounts because it failed to take into account her ability to pay them.
In determining whether to order restitution, the trial court must take into account the financial resources of the defendant and the burden that payment of restitution will impose. ORS 137.106(2)(a). Similarly, the court cannot sentence a defendant to pay costs unless…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fuller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- State v. DinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
- State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. EdsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Steffans v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986