State v. Keys

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction for unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135(l)(a). 1 He argues that the combine and swather which he was convicted of using without the owner’s consent are not "vehicles” within the meaning of that statute. Defendant also appeals the sentence order requiring him to pay restitution, arguing that the trial court erroneously failed to specify a payment schedule. See State v. Calderilla, 34 Or App 1007, 580 P2d 578 (1978). We affirm.

In State v. Essig, 31 Or App 639, 571 P2d 170 (1977), rev den (1978), this court held that the term "vehicle” in ORS…