Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 18, 1920PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Boyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

*206This action was instituted by the appellant, J. W. Pruitt, against the appellee, Norfolk & Western Ry. Co., to recover damages for the loss of one of his feet, which he averred was the result of negligence upon the part of the railway company. Pruitt was a section hand at the time of the injury suffered by him, and was engaged, together with others, under the directions of a section foreman, in repairing the track of a switch of the railway company near West Ironton, Ohio. The switch was used by the railway company in transporting materials to and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stirling Coal & Coke Co. v. ForkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  2. Flaig v. Andrews Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Bollington v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  4. Ohio Valley Railway Co. v. CopleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Louisville Water Co. v. DarnellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  2. Gabbard v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  3. Baez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Blackaby v. L. N. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  5. Davidson v. Perkins-Bowling Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API