Legal Opinion

Baez v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1962No. Civ. 10200PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEEK, P. J.—

Plaintiff Baez appeals from an adverse judgment in an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in the course of his employment with defendant Southern Pacific Company. The action was brought under the provisions of the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C.A. §51).

The complaint alleged that the defendant employer “was negligent in their operations as a railroad company in that they permitted plaintiff to work and install windows [on a dome car] without sufficient help and adequate and proper tools and scaffolding, ’ ’ that ‘ ‘ defendant was negligent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. DixonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1959
  4. Stout v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Fort Worth & Denver City Ry. Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mason v. CaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Holweger v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Anderson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API