Legal Opinion

Marcilionis v. Farmers Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1994No. CC 9201-00516; CA A75156; SC S40422PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

The issue in this declaratory judgment action is whether plaintiff was “occupying” his uncle’s car when he was struck and injured by an uninsured car. If so, he is entitled to uninsured motorist coverage as an “insured person” under the terms of his uncle’s car insurance policy issued by defendant Farmers Insurance Company (Farmers). We hold that plaintiff was not “occupying” his uncle’s car and, therefore, is not an insured person entitled to uninsured motorist coverage under his uncle’s car insurance policy.

The facts in this proceeding are not in dispute. On May 1, 1990, shortly after 3:00…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Perez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  3. MacKie v. Unigard Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Marcilionis v. Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. GoudeauTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. SimonovOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Genthner v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Carrigan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Kirkmeyer v. Department of Local AffairsColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API