Legal Opinion

State v. Simonov

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 2016No. CC CF110325; CA A151415; SC S063135PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for unauthorized use of a vehicle (UUV), a felony offense that is committed when a person “takes, operates, exercises control over, rides in or otherwise uses another’s vehicle * * * without consent of the owner.” ORS 164.135(l)(a). At trial, defendant requested an instruction that, to reach a guilty verdict, the jury must find that he knew that the use of the vehicle was without the owner’s consent; instead, the trial court instructed the jury that it could convict defendant if it found that he was criminally negligent with regard to whether the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. RainoldiOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. RutleyOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. BlantonOregon Supreme Court · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. CivilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. State v. OwenOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  4. State v. McNallyOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. State v. McKinney/ShifferOregon Supreme Court · 2022

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API