Legal Opinion
Goldsborough v. Eagle Crest Partners, Ltd.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1992No. CC 88-CV-0240-MS; CA A61979; SC S37927PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The sole question in this case is whether defendant 1 waived its lawyer-client privilege as to a letter that defendant wrote to its lawyer and that defendant’s lawyer voluntarily gave plaintiff in response to plaintiffs pretrial request for production of documents. The trial court ruled that defendant waived its privilege, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Goldsborough v. Eagle Crest Partners, Ltd., 105 Or App 499, 805 P2d 723 (1991). We also affirm.
Plaintiff sued her employer for statutory remedies pursuant to ORS 659.121(1) and for common law wrongful discharge, alleging that defendant had…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ferri v. AckermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CarlsonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University v. HaasOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Mains v. II Morrow, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State Ex Rel. McCormick v. ZakaibWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Doe v. MaretUtah Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.