Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Oregon Health Sciences University v. Haas

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1997No. SC S42952PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

In this original mandamus proceeding, relator seeks a peremptory writ of mandamus that would protect from discovery an investigatory report prepared by its lawyer. Relator is Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU), and defendant is a Multnomah County Circuit Court judge before whom a case involving relator is pending. At issue is whether a statement about the lawyer’s report, made by the chair of OHSU’s Anesthesiology Department during a faculty meeting, waived the lawyer-client privilege. For the reasons that follow, we hold that no waiver occurred. Because the report is protected by the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. McClureOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. G. D. W.Oregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. DurbinOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Reynolds v. SchrockOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Crimson Trace Corp. v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLPOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. SerranoOregon Supreme Court · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API