Legal Opinion

Midland Valley R. Co. v. Bryant

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 5, 1913No. 2448PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Osage County Court; C. T. Bennett, Judge. Action by Charles Amos Bryant against the Midland Valley Railroad’ Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHARP, C.

It is urged with great earnestness by counsel for plaintiff in error that the statute of this state, requiring railroads to fence their right of way,' does not require the construction of cattle guards at public crossings. Section 1389, Comp. Laws 1909, makes it the duty of every person or corporation owning or operating any railroad in this state to fence its road, except at public highway crossings and station grounds, with a good and lawful fence. A fence is defined to be:

“An inclosure about a field or other place, or about any object: especially, an inclosing structure…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Davis & YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. GosnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. T. S. Reed Grocery Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. SavageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hines v. McMillanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Davis v. WyskupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Parrish v. HainlenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  5. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API