Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Vance

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 9, 1926No. 16105PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ESTES, C.

A. B. Vance and wife owned jointly a certain parcel of rgal estate in Military Park addition to Oklahoma City, subject to a valid mortgage thereon in favor of one Raemer for $2,000, and a valid lien for $127.24, in favor of a brick company for materials furnished. Vance, without being joined by his wife, executed a mortgage on the parcel of land to plaintiff in error, Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland, to secure $3,411.82, which he owed said surety company, this mortgage being duly filed for record, but not at the times herein referred to, being numerically indexed in the proper…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kahn v. McConnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Kiniry v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Bormann v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Downer v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Owen v. Interstate Mortgage Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burgoon v. LavezzoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1937
  2. Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Landis v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of the Land OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API