Parrish v. Hainlen
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark
Defendants in error, who are related in blood as cousins, brought separate actions in the district court to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by each, resulting from an- explosion of methane gas at. a shaft house connected with the Bon Carbo coal mine located in Las Animas county and then in charge of plaintiffs in error. As the claims of both arose from the same occurrence with the pertinent facts identical, the cases were consolidated for trial and presently remain so joined. We will hereinafter refer to defendants in error as plaintiffs, and to plaintiffs in error as…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reino v. Montana Mineral Land Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- Dixon v. Kentucky Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Hayko v. Colorado & Utah Coal Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1925
- Gotch v. K. & B. Packing & Provision Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1933
- Mutual Lumber Co. v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ebert v. Millers Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Helen Anderson and William M. Anderson v. Hudspeth Pine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Southern Cross Ranches v. JBC Agricultural ManagementColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- County of San Diego v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Garel v. Jewish Community Centers of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.