Legal Opinion
Sherman v. New York Casualty Co.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided July 20, 1951No. Ex. No. 9198PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCondon, J.
This is an action of assumpsit which was tried before a justice of the superior court without a jury and resulted in a decision for the defendant. Plaintiff excepted to such decision and has brought the case here by his bill of exceptions containing only that exception.
The action is based on an agreement in an accident insurance policy wherein the defendant promised “To pay to or for each person who sustains bodily injury, caused by accident and arising out of the use of the automobile classified as ‘pleasure and business,’ while in or upon, entering or alighting from the automobile while the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ross v. Protective Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. FromerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Turner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Eshelman v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by31 opinions
- Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Wolf v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PennsylvaniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Goodwin v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Hendricks v. American Employers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Testone v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.