Legal Opinion
Ross v. Protective Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 5, 1948PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDickenson, J.
In this action the plaintiffs claimed coverage under an insurance policy issued by the defendant providing for medical payments caused by accidental injury arising out of the use of an automobile while in or upon, entering or alighting from it. They have appealed from a judgment for the defendant.
The facts are not disputed. The defendant issued a policy of insurance to the plaintiff Frank Ross on his automobile, which policy, in addition to agreements of indemnity for personal injury and property damage to others arising out of the ownership, maintenance and use of the car, contained the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Komroff v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Porto v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Dover v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
3Cited by39 opinions
- Raffel v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Wolf v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PennsylvaniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Goodwin v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Weingarten v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.