Legal Opinion

Goodwin v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 1, 1970No. [No. 70, October Term, 1951.]PublishedCited by 53 opinions

(Four Appeals in One Record)

1Opinion of the CourtMarbury, C. J.

Raymond T. Goodwin had his automobile insurance with the appellee. Coverage D in his policy was entitled “Medical Payments” with a limit of $500.00 for each person, and the coverage was described in the body of the policy as follows: “To pay all reasonable expenses incurred within one year from the date of accident for necessary medical, surgical, ambulance, hospital, professional nursing and funeral services, to or for each person who sustains bodily injury, sickness or disease, caused by accident, while in or upon, entering or alighting from the automobile, if the automobile is being used…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Cleo Syrup Corporation v. Coca-Cola Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. Madden v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Ross v. Protective Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. Anderson v. Federal Cartridge CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Westerfield v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Space Aero Products Co. v. R. E. Darling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  4. Bd. of County Commissioners of Garrett Cty. v. Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  5. Wolf v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PennsylvaniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API