Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Fromer

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1950No. 947PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Claiming under a “medical payments” clause of his liability policy a motorist sued his insurance company for injuries he sustained on the highway. He was awarded judgment and the insurance company appeals.

The facts were stipulated below and here. The policy provision on which recovery was based is in part as follows:

“Coverage C — Medical Payments
“To pay to or for each person who sustains bodily injury, caused by accident, while in or upon, entering or alighting from (1) the automobile, if the injury arises out of a use thereof which is insured for bodily injury liability…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bergholm v. Peoria Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Aschenbrenner v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Williams v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Madden v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Pennsylvania Indemnity Fire Corp. v. AldridgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Wolf v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PennsylvaniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. Goodwin v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Testone v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Sherman v. New York Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API