Legal Opinion
City of Hobart v. Carter
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 27, 1994No. 45A04-9309-CV-332PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHEZEM, Judge.
Case Summary
Defendant-Appellant, City of Hobart ("Hobart"), appeals the trial court's grant of Plaintiff-Appellee's, Floyd R. Carter's ("Carter"), remonstrance complaint. Having reviewed the evidence, findings, and conclusions, we reverse and remand.
Issues
Hobart presents several issues for our review, 1 which we restate as follows:
1. Whether the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction in determining whether the statutory duties imposed on Hobart under IND. CODE 36-4-3-13 were met.
2. Whether the specific findings of fact and conclusions of law entered by the trial court were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. WynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Indianapolis Convention & Visitors Ass'n v. Indianapolis Newspapers, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Aurora v. BRYANTIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
- KING v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Muncie v. LoweIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Town of Sellersburg v. Proposed Annexation of Certain Property Located in Clark CountyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- City of Fort Wayne v. Certain Southwest Annexation Area LandownersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- City of Hobart v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998