Legal Opinion

City of Hobart v. Carter

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1998No. 45A03-9609-CV-355PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOFFMAN, Judge.

The City of Hobart, Indiana appeals the trial court’s decision after remand by this Court granting i’emonstrators’ complaint.

The facts relevant to the cause are set out in the first appeal:

The City Council of Hobart approved Ordinance No. 92-07, to annex certain territory in unincorporated Ross Township. At the same time, the amended Fiscal Plan and Resolution 92-06 were also properly adopted. Carter soon after filed a Complaint for Remonstrance. Carter’s remonstrance Complaint was found to have met the statutory provisions for the requisite number of signatures of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hebel v. Conrail, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Lenard v. AdamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. City of Hobart v. CarterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API