Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2004No. 98-CV-739PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

This case arises in the aftermath of three lawsuits involving tenants of the Tyler House Apartments which extended over a period of almost ten years. Appellant, Adrienne Taylor, was a resident of Tyler House and the Secretary of the Tyler House Tenant Council when the first suit was filed in 1987. By her own account, Ms. Taylor played a substantial role in the early stages of the litigation. She helped the Tenant Council secure the services of the law firm of Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. (“Akin Gump”), on a pro bono basis. Akin Gump filed suit in the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  4. Colbert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. McBryde v. Amoco Oil Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Geier v. Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Teltschik v. Williams & Jensen, PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  3. Television Capital Corp. of Mobile v. Paxson Communications Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Crawford v. KatzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, PCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API