Legal Opinion
Clark v. Feder Semo and Bard, PC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 16, 2009No. Civil Action 07-470 (JDB)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Denise Clark initiated this action against Feder, Semo and Bard, P.C. (“Feder Semo”), the Feder Semo retirement plan (“retirement plan” or “plan”), and plan trustees Joseph E. Semo and Howard M. Bard (collectively “defendants”). Clark asserts Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”) violations against defendants that allegedly led to the underfunding of the plan and resulted in a significant reduction of the present value of her retirement benefits. Near the end of discovery, defendants filed a counterclaim against Clark for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kbi Transport Services v. Medical Transportation Management, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Capitol Medical Center, LLC v. Amerigroup Maryland, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Zalduondo v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Perry v. ScholarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Capitol Medical Center, LLC v. Amerigroup Maryland, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.