Legal Opinion
Geier v. Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 8, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1171PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Dr. Mark Geier and his son, David, brought suit seeking payment for consulting services rendered. Defendants are four law firms: Conway, Homer & ChinCaplan; John H. Kim & Associates, P.C.; Lommen, Abdo, Cole, King & Stageberg, P.A.; and Williams, Kherkher, Hart & Boundas LLP (collectively, the Law Firms). The Geiers allege that a committee of attorneys, including the Law Firms, retained the Geiers to provide consulting services in support of petitions filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Lagayan v. OdehDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Katopothis v. Windsor Mount Joy Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Wharf, Inc. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC v. BryantDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.