Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Olmstead

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1880No. 6,968PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal by the defendant Sarah A. Olmstead, from a judgment for the plaintiff, in the First District Court, County of Santa Barbara. Fawcett, J. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Department No. 2, Myrick, J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment decreeing foreclosure of mortgage and sale of the premises therein described. The questions in' controversy relate to a portion only of the premises, and to the proceedings regarding such portion.

November 17th, 1873, defendant Sarah A. Olmstead, wife of defendant Stephen H. Olmstead, executed and filed in the County Recorder’s office of the County of Santa Barbara, a declaration of homestead upon the portion above referred to. August 1st, 1876, defendant Stephen H. Olmstead executed the mortgage in question, embracing a tract of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Agard v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Hibberd v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Johnson v. BraunerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Reid v. Englehart-Davidson Mercantile Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Taylor v. MadiganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Viotti v. GiomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API