Hibberd v. Smith
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth District, City and County of San Francisco. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.
The record here contains a complaint demanding certain premises against several defendants (among whom is Charles Shore); an answer of Holladay, defending the action “in the name of said Shore," as his landlord, and denying the title of the plaintiffs, and averring that Holladay is himself the owner in fee of the premises, and that Shore is his tenant. It does not appear that the issues joined upon the pleadings in these respects have ever been disposed of in any way.
Another portion of the answer, as filed, is a cross bill, in which equitable relief is claimed against the plaintiff below, on…
2Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Baycol Cases I & IICalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Day v. DayIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Ashley v. OlmsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Dyment v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Seidner v. 1551 Greenfield Owners Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.